tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8473115843829010429.post1290516941688647230..comments2024-01-01T17:07:33.375-08:00Comments on Atomic Warlords: Lictor ReduxMarcus the Blackhearthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04188895276631758426noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8473115843829010429.post-35964213537206140032011-10-26T00:22:30.753-07:002011-10-26T00:22:30.753-07:00Any and all? That is just bad English. I would nev...Any and all? That is just bad English. I would never use such a weak and unclear phrase. <br />At least not after you pointed it out.Fixed, thanks!Marcus the Blackhearthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04188895276631758426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8473115843829010429.post-27731068510158105212011-10-25T21:38:57.839-07:002011-10-25T21:38:57.839-07:00Question on the Chameleonic Skin.
You say the p...Question on the Chameleonic Skin. <br /><br />You say the player can place any <i>and</i> all off-table Lictors onto the board. Do you mean any <i>or</i> all-- that I have the choice of deploying just one or deploying all of them?<br /><br />Actually, after watching countless examples of online rules bickering, a better wording might be "any number of off-table Lictors..." As it stands, someone could argue you could deploy one or all three, but not two.<br /><br />Granted, we don't play with those type of people...Virtual Strangerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01040333093180694172noreply@blogger.com